慰安妇七十四分队

　　克洛弗市是一个不起眼的小城，高中生卡森（克里斯·柯尔弗 Chris Colfer 饰）生长在离异家庭，母亲对他不闻不问，祖母患有老年痴呆。对卡森来说，走出克洛弗市是人生最大的动力。为实现自己进入西北大学新闻学院的梦想，卡森决定勒索整个学校来美化他的简历——他挖出学校里那些受欢迎同学的把柄，威胁拉拉队长、橄榄球明星、富家子弟们给他写稿，帮助他创办一份文学杂志。“然而命运击中你的身体，以任何可能的方式逃逸"，在他即将离校的前夕，他遭遇了一次雷劈......　　著名美剧《欢乐合唱团》演员克里斯·柯尔弗自编自演并出任制片的校园喜剧。

　　The main character is Dr. Max Holst, a successful neurosurgeon. One day an intense little man named Steinmetz shows up, who has the real ability to create objects out of thin air, using only his mind. As no one believes him at first, he is held at a ward for mental patients, but manifests the key to his door and escapes. As he has a special interest in Dr. Holst, Steinmetz subsequently invites Holst to his large mansion, which is full of expensive paintings and sculptures, and proves to him that he can in fact materialise objects. Steinmetz’s abilities are evolving by leaps and bounds, and is progressing from being able to create objects only to being able to create living things. His ultimate ambition is to be able to create a human being. He tells Dr. Holst that if he will only perform a certain brain operation on him, Steinmetz will become able to attain his goal. He’s got all the necessary equipment set up in his basement. Dr. Holst, however, is too spooked by the whole thing to agree to this mad scheme, and refuses. Steinmetz then sets about manipulating Holst’s life, to pressure him into performing the operation. By then Steinmetz has become able to create a temporary human being, and in the hope that he can perhaps make his own creation perform the operation, he manifests a doppelganger of Dr. Holst. This double proceeds to take over Dr. Holst’s life, creating chaos for him professionally and personally. And then Dr. Holst starts fighting back. The ending has the dual virtue of being both unexpected and satisfying.

　　该剧翻拍自50年前的英国同名剧集（原剧改编自长篇小说，并且拥有多达15部衍生电影），在翻拍版中，温文尔雅的跨国大盗Simon Templar（Adam Rayner）以「当代罗宾汉」自居——他专门盗窃那些富有的罪犯，并且每一次都能逃过黑白两道的追捕。作为一个精通伪装术、武术、间谍术和各种武器并且口才出众的超级间谍，这个英国绅士被某个政府机构征召，准备从事一项秘密任务，但当地执法机构对他恨之入骨。

　　一名男子不滿一樁冤獄案件的發生，私自綁架審判該案的法官，將其囚禁於地下室，並錄影開直播，公開質疑其判決有誤，要求社會大眾對其進行公審並投票，然而最終的結果，會因此撼動程序正義嗎？